By Stefan Silfverskiöld, Kent Andersson, Martin Lundmark

« The Military Utility Assessment of Future Technologies (MUAFT) method was developed as a cost-efficient alternative to methods such as NATO’s Disruptive Technology Assessment Games, to be used as a part of the Swedish Armed Forces’ long-term capability development process. The question addressed in this study is whether MUAFT can be considered to have validity in its context and thus if it has potential to be useful to other small to medium size states. The analysis was based on an operationalization of Clark’s framework for science and technology intelligence analysis, combined with a military capability centric view of military utility. MUAFT reports from 2012 to 2018 were reviewed in terms of how they satisfy five key criteria. The study shows that MUAFT provides utility, if used by a suitably composed group of experts, who are aware of the method’s limitations. The limitations mainly originate from a lack of explicit support for assessing the impact of forces for change, other than technological forces, on military capability development. The expert group serves as the synthesizing bridge between technology forecasts and military utility assessments. Therefore, comprehensive expertise is needed in various military technology specialisations, in the sponsor’s military capabilities and in subjects necessary to master in order to assess other influential societal forces for change. »

https://reader.elsevier.com/reader/sd/pii/S0160791X21002116?token=EC6797B40C8785F18119604B93A1F5999582383F6BEEDC52CE7204B1784545570B82F26646B322FD0AEE09C4D53C12BD&originRegion=eu-west-1&originCreation=20211006175755

%d blogueurs aiment cette page :